Find dating love site 2016 in haiti Live free adult cams totally nude
Haitian garment manufacturers, including contractors for Hanes and Levi Strauss, were furious, insisting that they were only willing to agree to a seven-cent increase. Hanesbrands Incorporated made 1 million on .3 billion in sales last year, and presumably it would pass on at least some of its higher labor costs to consumers.Or better yet, Hanesbrands CEO Richard Noll could forego some of his rich compensation package.And while some of that money has been put toward temporary housing, almost none of the funds have been used for rubble removal. [that] do not address as a whole either the emergency situation or the recovery, let alone the development, of Haiti.” A 2013 investigation by the Government Accountability Office found that most money for the recovery was not being dispersed, and that the projects that were being worked on were plagued by delays and cost overruns.writer called “a mishmash of low quality, poorly thought-out development experiments and half-finished projects.” A Haitian IHRC members lamented that the commission had produced “a disparate bunch of approved projects. Many Clinton projects were extravagant public relations affairs that quickly fizzled.At President Obama’s request, Clinton and George W.Bush created the “Clinton-Bush Haiti Fund,” and began aggressively fundraising around the world to support Haiti in the earthquake’s aftermath.The disaster killed 160,000 people and displaced over 1.5 million more.(The consequences of the earthquake were exacerbated by the ruined state of the Haitian food economy, plus the concentration of unemployed Haitian farmers in Port-au-Prince.) Bill Clinton was soon put in charge of the U. He was appointed to head the Interim Haiti Recovery Commission (IHRC), which would oversee a wide range of rebuilding projects.
reported that many Clinton projects “have primarily benefited wealthy foreigners and the island’s ruling elite, who needed little help to begin with.” For example, “the Clinton Bush Haiti Fund invested more than million in the Royal Oasis Hotel, where a sleek suite with hardwood floors costs more than 0 a night and the shops sell 0 designer purses and 0 men’s dress shirts.” Predictably, the Royal Oasis didn’t do an especially roaring trade; reported that “[o]ne recent afternoon, the hotel appeared largely empty, and with tourism hardly booming five years after the quake, locals fear it may be failing.” In a country with a 30-cent minimum wage, investing recovery dollars in a luxury hotel was not just offensive, but economically daft.Sometimes the recovery projects were accused not only of being pointless, but of being downright harmful.